<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Projected Consulting Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/</link>
	<description>Talking about Projects...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Funds Checking, Budgetary Control and Budget Integration with GL for Oracle Project Management by Barry Crawley</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/05/funds-checking-budgetary-control-and-budget-integration-with-gl-for-oracle-project-management/cpage/1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Crawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/05/funds-checking-budgetary-control-and-budget-integration-with-gl-for-oracle-project-management/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Maxine

Apologies for delay in responding to your post

Budgetary funds checking is available in Oracle Projects, and it only works for subcontract / purchases i.e. it does not work for any transactions that are batch processed (costed) in Oracle projects itself i.e. processes similar to GMS: Costing and Funds Checking for Miscellaneous Transactions&quot; in Grants do not exist in Oracle Projects. Instead OP has &quot;PRC: Distribute costs for Miscellaneous Transactions&quot; which does not check funds. You could try to customise processes in OP to do the funds checking using costing extensions

One thing to bear in mind with Oracle Projects, as per the subject of this blog, is that if you adopt the Oracle Project Management financial planning model funds checking does not work as standard, hence the reason for the blog really i.e. I believe there is a potential way round this. 

Hope this helps

Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxine</p>
<p>Apologies for delay in responding to your post</p>
<p>Budgetary funds checking is available in Oracle Projects, and it only works for subcontract / purchases i.e. it does not work for any transactions that are batch processed (costed) in Oracle projects itself i.e. processes similar to GMS: Costing and Funds Checking for Miscellaneous Transactions&#8221; in Grants do not exist in Oracle Projects. Instead OP has &#8220;PRC: Distribute costs for Miscellaneous Transactions&#8221; which does not check funds. You could try to customise processes in OP to do the funds checking using costing extensions</p>
<p>One thing to bear in mind with Oracle Projects, as per the subject of this blog, is that if you adopt the Oracle Project Management financial planning model funds checking does not work as standard, hence the reason for the blog really i.e. I believe there is a potential way round this. </p>
<p>Hope this helps</p>
<p>Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oracle SQL Functions in OBI Answers by Marc McGurk</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2010/04/oracle-sql-functions-in-obi-answers/cpage/1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc McGurk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2010/04/oracle-sql-functions-in-obi-answers/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Hi Christien, thanks for the question, there isn&#039;t, to my knowledge, an extensive translation list and yes, it can be very confusing at times.

If you can provide an example of the SQL/filter/report that you&#039;re having an issue with, we&#039;ll be happy to help your further.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christien, thanks for the question, there isn&#8217;t, to my knowledge, an extensive translation list and yes, it can be very confusing at times.</p>
<p>If you can provide an example of the SQL/filter/report that you&#8217;re having an issue with, we&#8217;ll be happy to help your further.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oracle SQL Functions in OBI Answers by Christien</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2010/04/oracle-sql-functions-in-obi-answers/cpage/1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Christien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2010/04/oracle-sql-functions-in-obi-answers/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Hi,

We use also BI Answers, I just did a SQL study, but I find it difficult to translate the several functions (GROUP BY, HAVING etc.) in BI Answers. When I use a filter for instance, which function do I use.

So, I am interested in the translation of SQL to BI-answer, can You help me?

Kind regards,

Christien Breukink</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>We use also BI Answers, I just did a SQL study, but I find it difficult to translate the several functions (GROUP BY, HAVING etc.) in BI Answers. When I use a filter for instance, which function do I use.</p>
<p>So, I am interested in the translation of SQL to BI-answer, can You help me?</p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Christien Breukink</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Funds Checking, Budgetary Control and Budget Integration with GL for Oracle Project Management by Maxine Fay</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/05/funds-checking-budgetary-control-and-budget-integration-with-gl-for-oracle-project-management/cpage/1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxine Fay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/05/funds-checking-budgetary-control-and-budget-integration-with-gl-for-oracle-project-management/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>I am looking at the feasibility of replacing Grants Accounting with Projects.  I am looking at the gaps in functionality between the two modules and would like some confirmation that Budgetary Control/Funds Checking is available in Projects.  It appears from this exchange that it is only available for AP/PO Transactions - could you confirm what the situation is please?  You don&#039;t mention it in your Oracle projects for Grants Users document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking at the feasibility of replacing Grants Accounting with Projects.  I am looking at the gaps in functionality between the two modules and would like some confirmation that Budgetary Control/Funds Checking is available in Projects.  It appears from this exchange that it is only available for AP/PO Transactions &#8211; could you confirm what the situation is please?  You don&#8217;t mention it in your Oracle projects for Grants Users document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on R12.1.2 &#8211; User Interface Enhancements by Suhail Maqsood</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2010/03/r1212-user-interface-enhancements/cpage/1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Suhail Maqsood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 17:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2010/03/r1212-user-interface-enhancements/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Great Article. I would also add that in 12.1.2 the following UI enhancements have been made which i think are worth mentioning:

Project &quot;Workbench&quot;
----------------
From what I could gather, the new Project List now has an additional two sections: Worklist (workflow objects) and Report Views.
Report Views put seem to be another name for Alternate Project Search and on my environment I could not get this to work and from what I hear, the Alternate Project Search works ad-hoc on many instances.

My concern would be just how well the page performs given some have previously complained of a performance issue on the Project List page. This will just add to that I fear!


Record History (Equivalent to /Row Who in Forms)
--------------------------------------
Record History allows users to see data about a particular record, such as who created the record and when, and who most recently updated the record and when.   Record history provides better auditing capabilities for OA Framework based pages
and ensures SOX compliance

For those of us used to Forms navigation, it’s the equivalent of 

/ Row Who


Improved Searches
---------------
There is now a Look Ahead LOV that is similar to a yahoo page where entering a letter will initiate the search with values being listed beneath the field. I have yet to see this in action within Projects and I believe upcoming changes within R12.1.3 will allow a user to identify which LOV field has Look Ahead enabled.

Flexfield References Support
----------------------
Currently, in Forms-based applications, users can set up Reference fields whose value is used to derive properties of segments in a flexfield. In Release 12.1.1, the same support has been extended to Oracle Application Framework-based applications.

Though technically, this was for !2.1.1 i think it still warrants to be mentioned in your blog since not many people are aware that it is now possible to reference OA FWK page fields to derive flexfield properties. Finally! Oracle has listened to one of the major obstacles of using flexfields within OA FWK pages.

Upcoming Popup window changes
--------------------------
I&#039;m particularly interested to see the new R12.1.3 Pop-up enhancements that will allow form submits. If executed right within the individual product teams, this should radically enhance the user interface for Project Mgt and finally put to rest navigation and # of clicks a user needs to make to complete a flow. With each popup submit it will also improve performance of pages since refresh rates will be less given the popup windows may only reference a cell or field within a page. I hope the ORacle Projects Development team revisits the PJT interface and enables this pop up submit capability on multiple steps within a complete flow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Article. I would also add that in 12.1.2 the following UI enhancements have been made which i think are worth mentioning:</p>
<p>Project &#8220;Workbench&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
From what I could gather, the new Project List now has an additional two sections: Worklist (workflow objects) and Report Views.<br />
Report Views put seem to be another name for Alternate Project Search and on my environment I could not get this to work and from what I hear, the Alternate Project Search works ad-hoc on many instances.</p>
<p>My concern would be just how well the page performs given some have previously complained of a performance issue on the Project List page. This will just add to that I fear!</p>
<p>Record History (Equivalent to /Row Who in Forms)<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Record History allows users to see data about a particular record, such as who created the record and when, and who most recently updated the record and when.   Record history provides better auditing capabilities for OA Framework based pages<br />
and ensures SOX compliance</p>
<p>For those of us used to Forms navigation, it’s the equivalent of </p>
<p>/ Row Who</p>
<p>Improved Searches<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
There is now a Look Ahead LOV that is similar to a yahoo page where entering a letter will initiate the search with values being listed beneath the field. I have yet to see this in action within Projects and I believe upcoming changes within R12.1.3 will allow a user to identify which LOV field has Look Ahead enabled.</p>
<p>Flexfield References Support<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Currently, in Forms-based applications, users can set up Reference fields whose value is used to derive properties of segments in a flexfield. In Release 12.1.1, the same support has been extended to Oracle Application Framework-based applications.</p>
<p>Though technically, this was for !2.1.1 i think it still warrants to be mentioned in your blog since not many people are aware that it is now possible to reference OA FWK page fields to derive flexfield properties. Finally! Oracle has listened to one of the major obstacles of using flexfields within OA FWK pages.</p>
<p>Upcoming Popup window changes<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
I&#8217;m particularly interested to see the new R12.1.3 Pop-up enhancements that will allow form submits. If executed right within the individual product teams, this should radically enhance the user interface for Project Mgt and finally put to rest navigation and # of clicks a user needs to make to complete a flow. With each popup submit it will also improve performance of pages since refresh rates will be less given the popup windows may only reference a cell or field within a page. I hope the ORacle Projects Development team revisits the PJT interface and enables this pop up submit capability on multiple steps within a complete flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Profile option &#8216;FND: View Object Max Fetch Size&#8217; by Darren
Farr</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/11/profile-option-fnd-view-object-max-fetch-size/cpage/1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren
Farr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/11/profile-option-fnd-view-object-max-fetch-size/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>The Profile option is also utilised in the new Primavera to Projects integration and one gotcha to look out for is 
&quot;There is a limitation when updating projects that contain more WBS tasks or resource assignments than the value set through profile &#039;FND: View Object Max Fetch Size&#039;. Default value of this profile is 200.So by default ,if the WBS contains more than 200 tasks or resource assignments is synced with Primavera, first 200 tasks or resource assignments will be synced&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Profile option is also utilised in the new Primavera to Projects integration and one gotcha to look out for is<br />
&#8220;There is a limitation when updating projects that contain more WBS tasks or resource assignments than the value set through profile &#8216;FND: View Object Max Fetch Size&#8217;. Default value of this profile is 200.So by default ,if the WBS contains more than 200 tasks or resource assignments is synced with Primavera, first 200 tasks or resource assignments will be synced&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E-Business Suite Release 12.1.2 now available by Barry Goodsell</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/12/e-business-suite-release-1212-now-available/cpage/1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Goodsell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/12/e-business-suite-release-1212-now-available/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Hi Ryan, 
We are looking to upgrade one of our R12.1.1 instances after Christmas, so I can post some screenshots then. Is there any area of the new functionality that you are particularly interested in?
Barry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ryan,<br />
We are looking to upgrade one of our R12.1.1 instances after Christmas, so I can post some screenshots then. Is there any area of the new functionality that you are particularly interested in?<br />
Barry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E-Business Suite Release 12.1.2 now available by Ryan Denner</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/12/e-business-suite-release-1212-now-available/cpage/1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Denner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/12/e-business-suite-release-1212-now-available/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Great post! Do you have any screenshots?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! Do you have any screenshots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on R12 Changes To Supplier Cost and Receipt Accrual Adjustments by Barry Crawley</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/11/r12-changes-to-supplier-cost-and-receipt-accrual-adjustments/cpage/1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Crawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/11/r12-changes-to-supplier-cost-and-receipt-accrual-adjustments/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Interesting the &#039;PA: Allow Adjustments to Receipt Accruals&#039; profile is actually documented in the imp guide as &#039;PA: Allow Adjustments to Receipt Accruals and Exchange Rate Variance&#039;, so a bit of a disconnect there. This is described as &quot;Determines whether a user can adjust receipt, receipt nonrecoverable tax, and exchange rate variance expenditure items in Oracle Projects when exchange rate variance exists and you convert journals to another currency&quot;. The key point here I think is &quot;when exchange rate variance exists and you convert journals to another currency&quot;, although I have never done this so not sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting the &#8216;PA: Allow Adjustments to Receipt Accruals&#8217; profile is actually documented in the imp guide as &#8216;PA: Allow Adjustments to Receipt Accruals and Exchange Rate Variance&#8217;, so a bit of a disconnect there. This is described as &#8220;Determines whether a user can adjust receipt, receipt nonrecoverable tax, and exchange rate variance expenditure items in Oracle Projects when exchange rate variance exists and you convert journals to another currency&#8221;. The key point here I think is &#8220;when exchange rate variance exists and you convert journals to another currency&#8221;, although I have never done this so not sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Profile option &#8216;FND: View Object Max Fetch Size&#8217; by Andy Coates</title>
		<link>http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/11/profile-option-fnd-view-object-max-fetch-size/cpage/1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Coates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.projectedconsulting.com/index.php/community/blog/2009/11/profile-option-fnd-view-object-max-fetch-size/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ryan, another good example relating to Projects. There are many places in the apps where 200 records is simply not enough for view objects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ryan, another good example relating to Projects. There are many places in the apps where 200 records is simply not enough for view objects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
